Thanks guys. Amazing feedback. Sounds like 2.5" is a better choice for being less in size (easier access for voicemail for example), as fast as 3.5" HDD in RPM, and allows 6 HDDs per Node which allows more RAID choice.
However, it does come to be more expensive. Thanks again, On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Benny Amorsen <benny+use...@amorsen.dk<benny%2buse...@amorsen.dk> > wrote: > bruce bruce <bruceb...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Other than the price difference (2.5" is more expensive and can't find > > many of the 1TB or so....) is there any preference, advantage, or > > disadvatage of chosing 2.5" HDD or 3.5" when it comes to the server > > operations or Asterisk operation? > > There is no difference. Pick the server which offers the disk bandwidth > and I/O's per second which you need. > > Do you really need 1TB disks? If you do, be careful what you place on > those disks. Reading e.g. a voice mail or a speak off a large slow > platter which is busy writing CDR's does not sound good at all. > > > /Benny > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
