Almost all of our fax machines are Canon, so it's kinda tough to test TxFax.
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 11:35, Serge Oleinikov wrote: > Hi Eric ! > I have the same problem with Canon fax mashine as you have. I have wrote an > email to Steve (developer of spandsp) some weeks ago and got no answer how > to fix the problem :( > Looks like connection was dropped by fax mashine without any reason > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Wieling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:19 PM > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems > > > > I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine. Any > > ideas? > > > > File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif' > > Changed from phase 0 to 2 > > Slow carrier up > > Slow carrier down > > Slow carrier up > > <<< NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56 > > 49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02 > > NSF without final frame tag > > The remote is made by 'Canon' > > <<< DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38 > > DIS with final frame tag > > In state 10 > > DIS: > > V.8 capable > > Preferred octets: 256 > > Can receive fax > > Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17 > > R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK > > 2D coding OK > > Scan line length: 215mm > > Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm) > > Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 > > Error correction mode > > T.6 coding > > R8x15.4lines/mm OK > > R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK > > Metric-based resolution preferred > > Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 > > North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm) > > North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm) > > Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic > > DCS: > > Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps > > 2D coding OK > > Scan line length: 215mm > > Recording length: A4 (297mm) > > Minimum scan line time: 20ms > > Start sending document > > Start tx document - compression 2 > > Fine mode > > Changed from phase 2 to 4 > > Sending ident > > >>> TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 > > >>> DCS: 83 00 c4 00 > > HDLC underflow in state 3 > > Changed from phase 4 to 6 > > Changed from phase 6 to 3 > > Slow carrier up > > <<< XCN: fa > > XCN with final frame tag > > In state 4 > > Disconnecting > > Changed from phase 3 to 7 > > Changed from phase 7 to 8 > > > > -- > > Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 > > "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows > > upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss." > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss." _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users