On Tue, 18 May 2004, brian k. west wrote: > Lets look at this and FIX the problem instead of hacking it. What you need > to do is install etherreal and capture a call and parse the timestamp info > to see if they are slipping. Because they are perfect here. > > bkw
I'd love to fix the problem, but no-one is listening! I did what you said, captured Ethereal traces, found that timestamps do not increment, found BLATANT errors in rtp.c where a signed int is being used to hold return values from an unsigned int function... and had my bug report thrown out because I am only able to reproduce the problem with chan_capi. Now I know that chan_capi doesn't belong to Digium, and I know that you're all trying to get a 1.0 release out. But this problem is really hurting my business, and right now destroying any chance that I might start offering Asterisk as part of commercial solutions. Now, kapejod is not replying to my e-mails, and markster's suggestion (from another bug report) of zeroing out the delivery field in chan_capi's read function did not work. So hacking is all I have left if I want to keep using Asterisk -- which I do, because I think it's a great program with a pretty good community around it. Vic Cross _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users