> I'd love to fix the problem, but no-one is listening! > > I did what you said, captured Ethereal traces, found that timestamps do > not increment, found BLATANT errors in rtp.c where a signed int is being > used to hold return values from an unsigned int function... and had my > bug report thrown out because I am only able to reproduce the problem with > chan_capi.
The problem isn't with asterisk chan_capi will have to be updated to deal with the changes. > Now I know that chan_capi doesn't belong to Digium, and I know that you're > all trying to get a 1.0 release out. But this problem is really hurting > my business, and right now destroying any chance that I might start > offering Asterisk as part of commercial solutions. I don't see these issues in any other channel driver. > Now, kapejod is not replying to my e-mails, and markster's suggestion > (from another bug report) of zeroing out the delivery field in chan_capi's > read function did not work. So hacking is all I have left if I want to > keep using Asterisk -- which I do, because I think it's a great program > with a pretty good community around it. Where are you ethereal traces so I can look over them. bkw _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users