Try RFC3761. It specifies E2U+<spec> under section 2.4.2. It obsoletes RFC2916, and nothing has superseded it yet.
Brian K. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 3762 is for h323 only: > > RFC 3762 - Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service > Registration for H.323 > > 2916 is a bit more general: > > RFC 2916 - E.164 number and DNS > > Then we have: > > RFC 2915 - The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource Record > > I was pointing out that E2U+IAX2 was backwards.. but then > again asterisk > doesn't really care about that... at this point. > > bkw > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Duane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > > >> Brian K. West wrote: >> >>> but then again what do I know.. I have only been using > enum for about a > year >>> now. >> >> RFC's change, if you want to stick to the standards you have to keep >> up with them... >> >> 3762 > 2916 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
