Any suggestions on how to resolve this problem? :) Thanks, Wojtek
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron J. Angel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 12:01 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > Try RFC3761. It specifies E2U+<spec> under section 2.4.2. It obsoletes > RFC2916, and nothing has superseded it yet. > > Brian K. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 3762 is for h323 only: > > > > RFC 3762 - Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service > > Registration for H.323 > > > > 2916 is a bit more general: > > > > RFC 2916 - E.164 number and DNS > > > > Then we have: > > > > RFC 2915 - The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource Record > > > > I was pointing out that E2U+IAX2 was backwards.. but then > > again asterisk > > doesn't really care about that... at this point. > > > > bkw > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Duane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:48 PM > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > > > > > >> Brian K. West wrote: > >> > >>> but then again what do I know.. I have only been using > > enum for about a > > year > >>> now. > >> > >> RFC's change, if you want to stick to the standards you have to keep > >> up with them... > >> > >> 3762 > 2916 > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
