Thanks for the info. We are using Hughes down here too (since they provide services to DirecWay). Not sure how the relationship is exactly. I think here (Guatemala) we use SATMEX5.
Next week I'll try it out. I'll be shocked out of my mind if it works on the sat connections down here, but hey, more sales :). Thanks, -Michael -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jefferson Carvalho Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:43 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Over Satellite => It works ! Hello Michael , Iīm using Hughes Telecom services. His "satellite footprint" unfortunatelly , donīt cover your area. I have sucess using other providers. My contract allows me a downstream conn ( 512kbps/s ) and upstream ( 100kbps/s). I donīt know exacly to say why IAX2 over satellite is better than SIP. I only have made " some tests " and i had a better conversation Using IAX. Regards , -Jefferson Carvalho Michael Giagnocavo wrote: >What differences between IAX2 and SIP did you see? What sat provider are you >using? And what's your average bandwidth available? > >I'm in Guatemala, and I know some people on satellite would be overjoyed to >find a working VoIP solution. Unfortunately, it's mainly DirecWay, and they >really suck (750ms seems to be on the low end of response times :(). > >Thanks, >-Michael > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jefferson >Carvalho >Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:14 PM >To: Asterisk Users Mailing List >Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Over Satellite => It works ! > >Hello all , > >Iīd like to annouce and share my results on using IAX2 >over a satellite conn. here in Brazil. >Iīm using IAX2/G.729 and works very well except the >latency on my link ( =~750ms ). >"Downstream" conversation is perfect , the "Upstream" >works fine but i " feel" some long delays. >I donīt have any kind of echo :) >I was using SIP/G.729 and i didnīt have problems ... >but i have to say ... that IAX2 is better in this case. > >Best Regards , > >-Jefferson Carvalho > Teresina-PI-Brazil > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
