So what changes with T.38? You still need spandsp to interwork with the
PSTN. What was so hard about getting spandsp to work? (I'm genuinely
interested)
Regards,
Steve
Darren Sessions wrote:
Someone should put a bounty on T38. We're using spandsp right now and
have had success - but it was an absolute pain to get it to work.
On Oct 19, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
Michael Loftis wrote:
Just my $0.02 but seems to me the VoIP community as a whole needs to
extend SIP (or IAX?) with a special 'fax data' mode wherein the
gateways either act locally as the modem and queue/push bits (not
audio data) for the remote end or transparently bridge them through
in the case of a passthrough call.
IMO faxes need to die, but business still loves them.
As I said, just my $0.02.
That is such a good idea they did it several years ago. Its called
T.38 for H.323 and SIP. IAX doesn't yet have something similar, but
its high on the list of things to do.
Regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
