I am trying to get Asterisk to register with a SIP provider who officially only supports ATAs of the incumbent telephone monopolist over here.
I have so far been lucky enough to get them to ***respond*** to my requests for information on what parameters need changing in the REGISTER messages in order to successfully register. Confusion arises from the fact that there are two different user IDs, one is a telephone number associated with the SIP account, say 05099999999, the other is an account name, say DUDEDUDE. The provider's support staff says that the userid in 'From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...' should be the phone number while the userid in 'Authorization: Digest username="userid"...' of the same REGISTER message should be the account name. I am not sure if this can be right. At least, whether compliant or not, it would seem that such a REGISTER message cannot be constructed by Asterisk. If I use "register => [EMAIL PROTECTED]" then then Asterisk will construct a REGISTER message with the phone number in both the From field and the username field in the digest. If I use "register => [EMAIL PROTECTED]" then Asterisk uses the account name in both places. The optional parameter at the end of the register directive only seems to have an effect on the contact field, ie "register => [EMAIL PROTECTED]/123456789" will still put "fred" into both the From field and the username field of the digest while "123456789" will show up in the Contact field only. Can somebody comment on this? - is it in compliance with RFC3261 to have different values in the >From and the Digest username fields? - can Asterisk construct such a REGISTER message? To illustrate this a bit further, here is an excerpt from a session transscript ... REGISTER sip:ispvoip-9999.ocn.ne.jp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 9.9.9.9:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6920ea27 From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=as040e1159 To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 961 REGISTER Authorization: Digest username="05099999999", realm="ocn.ne.jp", algorithm="MD5", uri="sip:210.9.9.9", nonce="1099640598", response="a9d877017f24bb624cdc1a39a8a73b4c", opaque="" Expires: 120 Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Event: registration SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized v: SIP/2.0/UDP 9.9.9.9:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6920ea27 From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=as040e1159 To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 961 REGISTER Expires: 120 Event: registration Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 08:17:48 GMT WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="ocn.ne.jp", domain="sip:210.9.9.9", nonce="1099640598", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 The provider's support staff suggested that their server expected to see a REGISTER message like the following: REGISTER sip:ispvoip-9999.ocn.ne.jp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 9.9.9.9:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6920ea27 From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=as040e1159 To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 961 REGISTER Authorization: Digest username="DUDEDUDE", realm="ocn.ne.jp", algorithm="MD5", uri="sip:210.9.9.9", nonce="1099640598", response="a9d877017f24bb624cdc1a39a8a73b4c", opaque="" Expires: 120 Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Event: registration Unfortunately, I have not been able to get Asterisk to construct a message like the above. any hints appreciated. rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users