On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Nick Bachmann wrote: > You know you shouldn't (can't?) use the same interface for regular IP > networking and TDMoE, right? The TDMoE should have an address-less NIC > to itself and _really_ shouldn't run through a hub (an xover would be > ideal). Bonding seems possible, since the bonding is done at a lower > level than Asterisk knows about and just creates a virtual device. > Because both sides just see one NIC with one MAC, the only problem I > could anticipate would be increased latency, but I doubt it's as > significant as the latency a switch creates.
The latency through a gigabit switch should be negligible anyway. Peter _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users