On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Nick Bachmann wrote:

> You know you shouldn't (can't?) use the same interface for regular IP 
> networking and TDMoE, right?  The TDMoE should have an address-less NIC 
> to itself and _really_ shouldn't run through a hub (an xover would be 
> ideal).  Bonding seems possible, since the bonding is done at a lower 
> level than Asterisk knows about and just creates a virtual device.  
> Because both sides just see one NIC with one MAC, the only problem I 
> could anticipate would be increased latency, but I doubt it's as 
> significant as the latency a switch creates.

The latency through a gigabit switch should be negligible anyway.

Peter


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to