----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Junker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Phones-Receptionist Setup
I'm not saying that it would compromise *'s 'PBXness'. But you are comparing products that have DECADES of development and maturity, building on basic features that * is just now getting stable, and that use proprietary hardware to accomplish these features.
Kinda my point. I reiterate, if someone wants to help design and implement a separate project to accomplish the key functionality, then I would be happy to work on it.
Greg
I have just read again some of the posts in this thread.
The thread started by somebody asking if they could use a SNOM 220 as a receptionist phone. It has gone on to discuss the use of CTI to implement these features and to discuss the possibility of making custom hardware solutions.
Am I missing something- why can't some of the new SIP phones be used for this? Are they missing some hardware feature?
If we are to start a project to create a receptionist phone why do we not just take one or two of these and make them work in this way??
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-November/071065.html
http://www.polycom.com/common/pw_item_show_doc/1,1276,1820,00.pdf
http://www.snom.com/download/data_snom220e.pdf
Or am I missing something??
Ian
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
