[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Antony Stone schrieb: >> On Wednesday 15 December 2004 21:26, Michael Vogel wrote: >> >>> Is it a little bit too much for such a machine? What could be the >>> bottleneck? CPU? Memory? Interrupts? >> >> My advice would be to whack in a load more RAM - basically, try to >> get the poor little thing so it doesn't need to use swap. That will >> make a big difference to performance. > > I just doubled the memory, now I have 256mb and I am using - by now - > zero bytes for swap ;-) > > The values at "show translation" doesn't change. And they > change only a > little bit when I unload the "baycom_ser_hdx"-module that generates > three times more interrupts than the wcfxo-module.
Hmmm. I propose that we make your system the list guinea pig! If we can get that one tweaked, there's no telling what alse we can do with Asterisk! Have you tried running Asterisk at pseudo-realtime priority? (asterisk -p) _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
