A lot of this has to do with the stupid linux kernel changing HDLC api time after time after time.. I think at least 4 times thus far. I think if you use 2.4.18 kernel you'll be able to get it to work.
bkw > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Critchfield > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 1:32 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: [digium.com #12961] T100P as bandwidth > > On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 13:26 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > > On December 23, 2004 12:58 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote: > > > Maybe some of the users just aren't up to the task of getting the job > > > done. My experience thus far has been very good. All the hardware with > > > the exception of one which was in marginal at best pieces of equipment > > > has performed perfectly and without fault. > > > > The T100P is generally good and the TE405P is solid, IMO. > > > > However we're not talking about audio and these cards. :-) > > I happen to know of at least one person doing mixed audio and data. I > even have done ISDN dialup via ZapRAS when we had to prove it worked. I > think it is as stated before, the free 1 hour of support is insufficient > to help a mildly knowledgeable user through the setup. > > > > I think some users need to have their assumptions and values checked > to > > > see how far from reality they are. > > > > While I agree, I also must point out > > - TDM400P - this card seems to be the #1 source of problems. I believe > the > > FXO module issues are solved but the FXS issues are still around. > Hopefully > > the same fix works. > > I think this is also a case of unprepared users and a not yet polished > product. Only those doing small time to hobby deployments use those > cards. You can't expect them to be as knowledgeable as the people > deploying on PRIs. I think both aspects compound the trouble. > > > - IAXy - I have no personal experience with this but the list has been > showing > > dead modules recently > > Out of the number of multi hundred deployments I have heard about, I > think the couple you hear here and there are probably statistically > insignificant overall. Doesn't help the specific users who are getting > bit, but overall, I don't see enough to think there is an inherent > problem. > -- > Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
