Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 11:36, Jim Van Meggelen wrote: >> But we already know that Polycoms work with Asterisk, so what >> does this give us that we don't already have? > > it's for the warm-fuzzy that those who buy ABE want. They > want an approved vendor list, they want coporate assurances > and SLAs. ABE does that, and this is the first step in giving > ABE an approved vendor list.
Good point. > So no, it doesn't give us who don't really care for such > things anything much... but it's a start at getting Asterisk > into those places that do, which drives everything in terms of > widespread acceptance. Agreed > It's kind of the same how RHEL gives Linux wider acceptance > and "corporate" facetime. The proverbial "neck to choke" >> I contend that my point remains relevant. Polycom is *not* >> saying that thair phones work with Asterisk, only with ABE. >> The fact that the two softwares are (nearly) identical is >> irrelevant from Polycom's perspective. > > And since ABE is a subset of Asterisk, the phones by deduction > work with Asterisk. Polycom won't care if something in > Asterisk 1.2 or -HEAD breaks the compatibility, they will only > care and ensure that ABE works as intended with their phones. That's just it. It improves the chance that problems which may happen in the future with Asterisk and Polycom are likely to be addressed, but it doesn't give the community any more clout when it comes to getting the problems fixed. Jim. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/106 - Release Date: 19/09/2005
