On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 19:16 -0400, Henry Coleman [VoIP-PBX.ca] wrote:
> I am not (surprisingly enough) going to try and make a case for "reply
> to: list"
> I would however, expect that there must be a better way to accomplish
> the same thing.
> As the group grows the amount of e-mail that gets generated is staggering
> Is there an option to migrate to a web based list ?
>
> Henry
I also agree that we should have the list munge the reply-to header.
This is really a case of appealing to the majority. The main reason to
not munge reply-to is that the user's reply-to header line is lost. How
many people have different Reply-tos today? I did a scan of the last 392
messages (from my inbox) and Nabeel is the only one with a reply-to
different than his From address and it looks like it's because of other
reasons.
Then take the case of reply. I reply more often to the list than to the
author. To be nice to the author I don't "reply to all" ((s)he'd get
two), but I cut and paste. I would far rather cut and paste when I
reply to author.
--
John Van Ostrand
Net Direct Inc.
Chief Technology Officer
564 Weber St. N. Unit 12
Waterloo, ON N2L 5C6
map
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: 519-883-1172
ext.5102
Linux Solutions / IBM
Hardware
Fx: 519-883-8533
