Agreed! ----------------- Henry L. Coleman [VoIP-PBX.ca] =================
> Andre Courchesne - Consultant< > I always suggest to keep analog lines or even keep landlines or better > PRI and use VoIP trunks first, but with a fallback to the landlines. > > Nothing worst that having a customer with no phone because his internet > is down. Well, worst is having a custome not able to reach 911 because > his internet is down. > > > ---- > Andre Courchesne - Consultant > http://www.net-forces.com > MSN: [email protected] > Skype: VoipForces > > L'information contenue dans le présent document est la propriété de > Andre Courchesne. Et est divulguée en toute confidentialité. Cette > information ne doit pas être utilisée, divulguée à d'autres personnes ou > reproduite sans le consentement écrit explicite de Andre Courchesne. > > The information contained in this document is confidential and property > of Andre Courchesne. It shall not be used, disclosed to others or > reproduced without the express written consent of Andre Courchesne. > > > Henry L.Coleman wrote: >> Both previous solutions will work however I would port the main number to >> Unlimitel (with 5 channels or more) and >> purchase another voip line for dialing out. This solution will save a bucket >> full of money every month. >> If you need to have an analog linefor back up then keep the bell number and >> forward the line on "busy" to a voip >> line. >> Check with bell that they can do "call forward on busy" first :) >> >> Henry L.Coleman [VoIP-PBX.ca] >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>> Andre Courchesne< >>> Ask that your VoIP DID be put as the overflow number. >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Andre Courchesne - Consultant >>> >>> http://www.net-forces.com >>> >>> MSN: [email protected] >>> >>> Skype: VoipForces >>> >>> >>> >>> L'information contenue dans le présent document est la propriété de >>> Andre Courchesne. Et est divulguée en toute confidentialité. Cette >>> information ne doit pas être utilisée, divulguée à d'autres >>> personnes ou reproduite sans le consentement écrit explicite de Andre >>> Courchesne. >>> >>> >>> >>> The information contained in this document is confidential and property >>> >>> of Andre Courchesne. It shall not be used, disclosed to others or >>> >>> reproduced without the express written consent of Andre Courchesne. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 9-Sep-09, at 10:09 PM, Yajie Si wrote: >>> >>>> i have a business customer who has subscribed bell local link >>>> package B. It >>>> include 3 local lines hunting feature (line A->line B->line C), >>>> which he has >>>> line A number advertised so one incoming called, it will hunt to B >>>> and C >>>> number. He can have 3 concurrnt calls. ï¼®ow, his bussiness have >>>> grown and a >>>> lot of time he has more than 4 incoming calls coming in. >>>> >>>> I applied another voip line and a DID for him and i called Bell to >>>> ask them >>>> to make a line busy forward on line C to the new voip number, but >>>> they told >>>> me busy forwarding (*91) is not supported on the hunting line. What >>>> can i >>>> do? any suggestions? >>>> >>>> thx in advance. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
