I am on Asterisk 1.6.2.14, my settings look like this: [general] ; general settings in my sip.conf context=default port=5060 bindaddr=0.0.0.0 srvlookup=no defaultexpirey=300 videosupport=yes ; Turn on support for SIP video useragent=asterisk alwaysauthreject=yes allowguest=no t38pt_udptl=yes,redundancy qualifyfreq=15
[1005] ; this is the peer for the phone type=friend context=default secret=somepassword host=dynamic disallow=all allow=ulaw allow=g729 allow=h263 allow=h263p dtmfmode=rfc2833 canreinvite=no nat=yes qualify=yes mailbox=1...@default subscribecontext=default On the phone I did nothing special, just entered the SIP username, password, proxy and domain. I did not even configure a STUN server. The phone came with firmware 2.50. I upgraded one to 2.76, but that seems a little less stable than 2.5 Liviu On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Reza - Asterisk Consultant <[email protected]> wrote: > Gentlemen, please share more details as per your Asterisk versions, and > settings here. Though screen shot is somewhat a challenge here - please > provide some config details. > > Both your experiences are quite the opposite of mine, so would appreciate > some technical feedback here - to get it rolling. > * > * > *Thanks and regards,* > *Reza.* > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Liviu Toma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have a couple of these as well, installed behind NAT firewalls and >> talking over the internet to my hosted asterisk (on a hosted server, >> public IP) and I had no issues. Also video calls are working fine in >> this scenario. >> >> Liviu >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Chris Chen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I bought two Nortel 1535 phones from ebay, I should share my own >> experience >> > vs your experience with the list here >> > >> > e. Sound quality is crap >> > >> > Compared to Polycom/Aastra/Snom phones I have, its quality is the same >> level >> > as Aastra phone >> > >> > f. Managed to get it working over a LAN exclusively. >> > I have one phone working via Wireless, one phone with wired LAN, I didn't >> > test with any SIP servers outside my LAN, but lots of users do >> > >> > g. No video / H264 or H263 in the LAN with Asterisk. >> > I have one phone registered with my Asterisk, one phone registered with >> my >> > FreeSWITCH, none of them is Nortel or SipX platform, the video calls >> using >> > H264 and H263 with Asterisk/FreeSWITCH or mix all working very well. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Chris Chen >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Reza - Asterisk Consultant < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> To make the long story short my friend, they are crap! >> >> >> >> Its not true that I did not like the phone due to firmware issues. >> >> >> >> I did not like it because of the following issues: >> >> a. zero access to latest firmware >> >> b. poor or no access over NAT >> >> c. does not perform in a Hosted environment >> >> d. Inability to keep registrations ongoing >> >> e. Sound quality is crap >> >> f. Managed to get it working over a LAN exclusively. >> >> g. No video / H264 or H263 in the LAN with Asterisk. >> >> h. No Web UI to log into. >> >> i. A bloody pain in the behind to provision the phone to your userid >> and >> >> password via the number pad. >> >> >> >> By the time you are done programming the userid and password via the >> >> telephone interface and keypad, it will be at least 10 minutes. >> >> >> >> There is no proper and easy support for this on Asterisk, contrary to >> other >> >> people's claims. It does work, flawlessly on sipX and Nortel >> platforms. >> >> Well... it better be working on Nortel platforms because its made by >> >> Nortel. >> >> >> >> Yes, people have had success - but extremely limited success on Asterisk >> >> (and that too within a LAN only). >> >> >> >> They are not cheap if you are using it on Asterisk. It will be an >> >> expensive paper weight. >> >> >> >> In my opinion, you should not have to spend more than a minute or two - >> to >> >> configure a phone manually to connect to your PBX, hosted or in-house. >> >> Though I am not fond of Grandstream phones, I must say that in my tests >> >> the >> >> Grandstream video phones worked flawlessly and was provisioned in >> minutes. >> >> There was clear and consistent video over two sets of Grandstream video >> >> phones connected across continents. You also get to see your own video >> >> echo >> >> back to you in a regular echo() test. >> >> >> >> You truly get what you pay for. >> >> >> >> Cheers! >> >> Reza. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Bruce N <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Hi Everyone, >> >> > I know that this came up on the list before and I think Reza didn't >> >> really >> >> > like the phone due to firmware issues but it seems that it's making >> some >> >> > news these days. >> >> > http://nerdvittles.com/?p=703 >> >> > One thing that it impresses me is that it does OpenVPN. Wooo,,,,that >> is >> >> > 100% a bonus. But really what is the catch. IP Video phone under $100. >> >> Are >> >> > these knock offs from China? Did someone steal the blueprint for the >> >> frame >> >> > and copied the software? Are these cheap because they are one line >> >> support? >> >> > Can anyone weight in? >> >> > Thanks,Bruce >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
