I'm not sure on your usage either but after a quick read I am guessing it is for connection redundancy. If that is the case I would think that the wireless connection goes to a nearby cell site and then directly into the Rogers cable Internet infrastructure. How suitable that is as fail-over for a direct Rogers cable connection I am not sure. I'm certain others would have more insight to this than I. What your other options would be in that vicinity I don't know at present. That requires more guesses as to why the Rogers connection - ie, DSL unavailable.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Jason Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > Bruce, > > Im not sure what the exact usage will be, but for any of our remote > connections > we use point to point services from whoever has the best rates at the > time... > Obviously this is more expensive, but the reliability is amazing and > speeds > blazing - see below for some companies (pulled from Canadianisp)... > > Broadline Networks (2500/mop) > Storm Internet SErvices (500/mo) > Futurelink Communication (see site) > ICA Wireless (200/mo) > SwitchWorks (100/mo) > Canada Online (200/mo) > > Jason > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Bruce N <[email protected]> > To: asterisk Mailing <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, March 16, 2011 1:58:04 PM > Subject: [on-asterisk] Recommendations for Internet Sticks for area around > Pearson Airport > > > Hi Everyone, > > > Looking to transfer some voice channels over the internet and need to > decide > which stick to go with along with a Rogers cable connections that is > dedicated > to the same purpose. > > > Location is 1Km of freeways 409/427 intersection. > > > I know Reza had success with Windmobile but I am not sure if 1Mbps will be > enough for 15 or more channels. Maximum 23. Please give me some feedback if > you > use sticks from any provider in these areas or surroundings. > > > Thanks, > Bruce >
