Chad, Thanks for weighing in. I am not sure if the "rep" phone in Mitel (aka Aastra) 68 series has any advantages over 6731i, does it? I like how it stands high but seems like no other improvement.
Regards, -Bruce On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Chad Osmond <[email protected]> wrote: > We used to use Polycom, then I got an Aastra 6867i, lots of buttons, > Beautiful phone, 5 button BLF/XFer on the left side. Colour Screen also. > > Provisioning with OSS Endpoint Manager, or the commercial module if > flawless, and they're Gig POE too. Pricing is very reasonable. > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Lloyd Aloysius <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > I always use the Polycom phones. Recently start to using the Yealink > > Phones. They are really good. Deployed lots of phones and do not have any > > issues.Provision is easy and simple. > > > > Yealink SIP T23GP is a POE phone. > > > > Thanks > > Lloyd > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Brian Chamberlain <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > It's definitely poe.. > > > On 22 May 2015 17:09, "Bruce N" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah, they look great but I have never used them. I just noticed the > > 1gig > > > > model, doesn't come with POE and it's comparable to Aastra 6731i so > > there > > > > is no price difference but advantage for 1gig port which I am not > sure > > if > > > > client needs. > > > > > > > > I am assuming provisioning is easy like it is for Aastra? > > > > > > > > Thanks for your input. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Brian Chamberlain < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Without sounding like a yealink salesman (I'm not) they're the best > > > >> devices I've used. Really nice sip stack. Different Vlan support on > > both > > > >> ports.. > > > >> > > > >> They are excellent devices.. > > > >> On 22 May 2015 16:59, "Bruce N" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> James: Two reasons: > > > >>> > > > >>> 1- Huge price difference ~$105 vs ~$85 (20%) > > > >>> 2- More features, color screen, blah blah > > > >>> > > > >>> Brian: I just looked at Yealink SIP T23GP. Is that what you have > > tested > > > >>> in field? Does it work well in terms of VLANs and being able to > > support > > > >>> separate subnet to PC port? I would like also of course like to > have > > > >>> whatever an Aastra 6731i can do. > > > >>> > > > >>> -Bruce > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:43 AM, James Knott < > > [email protected]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> On 05/22/2015 11:34 AM, Bruce N wrote: > > > >>>> > Hi everyone, > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > I use Aastra phones all over as the provisioning is easy on > them. > > > For > > > >>>> sake > > > >>>> > of pricing and features, now I am looking at Grandstream > GXP2130. > > I > > > am > > > >>>> > wondering if anyone can give thumbs up for these phones sets. > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > Current Aastra sets support VLAN tagging for phone port and > > separate > > > >>>> VLAN > > > >>>> > tagging for PC port which is important to me (need to keep > > networks > > > >>>> > separate). I also must have the PC port on the phone. Given this > > > >>>> particular > > > >>>> > model is priced good, I am inclined to buy that instead of > aastra > > > >>>> 6731i > > > >>>> > which doesn't have AC adapter and must be bought separately. > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > Are there any specific problems, cons, or pros to Grandstream > > > GXP2130 > > > >>>> > units? I am looking for field experience. > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > Thanks, > > > >>>> > Bruce > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Is there some reason you don't want to use PoE? I've set up > enough > > > >>>> phones to know that's the way to go. My concern about the Aastra > is > > > >>>> that it's only 100 Mb/s. That's fine for the phone, but since you > > > want > > > >>>> to also use the PC port, it would limit the computer to 100M. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
