Michael Cargile wrote: > Sorry I have not gotten back to this till now. I was placed on another > project for a couple of days. Anyways...
Same here. If you count taxes as a project. I do have some other project work that will keep me tied up for most of the next 2-3 weeks though. > Currently I am compiling the basic x86 system from the developement > enviroment and we will use that till I can build an x86_64 optimized build. There probably won't be a huge benefit to doing a 64bit build. > Also how hard is it to get the development enviroment to use the head > version of asterisk instead of the stable... I realize that some of the > patches might need to be updated but besides that. The reason I ask is > we found some bugs in asterisk and are patching the head to fix them. I would be against this most of the time. head isn't always stable. It shouldn't be too difficult to create two asterisk packages, one from stable, one where you could specifiy a version number from svn (or something along those lines). The way I look at it, the developers have been doing a pretty good job lately of making a releases available promptly after bugs are found and fixed. Darrick -- Darrick Hartman DJH Solutions, LLC http://www.djhsolutions.com _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kriscompanies.com/mailman/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
