Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelm...@openmesh.com> wrote: > The ath10k firmware doesn't announce its VHT channel width capabilities in > the vht_cap information from the "service ready event" arguments. The > driver must therefore check whether the 160MHz short GI bit is set and > whether the driver still doesn't set the bits for the 160/80+80 MHz > capabilities. > > The two bits for the channel width are a two bit integer and not two > separate bits which cannot be parsed without the knowledge of the other > bit. Using IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160_80PLUS80MHZ (b10..) as a > mask for this task doesn't make any sense. The correct mask for the VHT > channel width should be used instead to make this check more readable. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> > [sven.eckelm...@openmesh.com: separate 160Mhz workaround cleanup, add commit > message] > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelm...@openmesh.com> > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kv...@qca.qualcomm.com>
3 patches applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks. e509e5947708 ath10k: use complete VHT chan width for 160MHz workaround cc914a55006e ath10k: configure rxnss_override for QCA9984 6824834946a6 ath10k: set rxnss_override for QCA9888 -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9778085/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
