On 5/6/24 12:39, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
On 29/04/2024 16:07, Marc Gonzalez wrote:

The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator
to complete initialization. If the indicator is not
received, then the device remains unusable.

cf. ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work()

Several msm8998-based devices are affected by this issue.
Oddly, it seems safe to NOT wait for the indicator, and
proceed immediately when QMI_EVENT_SERVER_ARRIVE.

Jeff Johnson wrote:

   The feedback I received was "it might be ok to change all ath10k qmi
   to skip waiting for msa_ready", and it was pointed out that ath11k
   (and ath12k) do not wait for it.

   However with so many deployed devices, "might be ok" isn't a strong
   argument for changing the default behavior.

cf. also
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Qualcomm_Snapdragon_835_(MSM8998)#WLAN

Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <mgonza...@freebox.fr>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
index 67b8374ddf02f..4e6245095adfc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
@@ -3234,6 +3234,7 @@ wifi: wifi@18800000 {
                        iommus = <&anoc2_smmu 0x1900>,
                                 <&anoc2_smmu 0x1901>;
                        qcom,snoc-host-cap-8bit-quirk;
+                       qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator;
                };
        };
  };


Bjorn,

This patch is supposed to go through your tree, right?

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dyb...@linaro.org>

Konrad

Reply via email to