Marc Gonzalez <mgonza...@freebox.fr> wrote:

> The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator
> to complete initialization. If the indicator is not
> received, then the device remains unusable.
> 
> cf. ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work()
> 
> Several msm8998-based devices are affected by this issue.
> Oddly, it seems safe to NOT wait for the indicator, and
> proceed immediately when QMI_EVENT_SERVER_ARRIVE.
> 
> Jeff Johnson wrote:
> 
>   The feedback I received was "it might be ok to change all ath10k qmi
>   to skip waiting for msa_ready", and it was pointed out that ath11k
>   (and ath12k) do not wait for it.
> 
>   However with so many deployed devices, "might be ok" isn't a strong
>   argument for changing the default behavior.
> 
> Kalle Valo first suggested setting a bit in firmware-5.bin to trigger
> work-around in the driver. However, firmware-5.bin is parsed too late.
> So we are stuck with a DT property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <mgonza...@freebox.fr>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjora...@quicinc.com>
> Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohn...@quicinc.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <r...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <quic_kv...@quicinc.com>

2 patches applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.

71b6e321e302 dt-bindings: net: wireless: ath10k: add 
qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator prop
6d67d18014a8 wifi: ath10k: do not always wait for MSA_READY indicator

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/54ac2295-36b4-49fc-9583-a10db8d9d...@freebox.fr/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches


Reply via email to