On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail > just to be sure.
I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright, so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently has is alright by me. Even if the changes were significant, the previous holds. However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :) > Ps. Please do not open any can of worms here, this is just informational. Sure. I like the ath9k way, but really it doesn't matter that much. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
