it seems as though all the correct interfaces are now free to use and there is no point in renaming any of them... still dunt werk with this error.
dmesg | grep -i ath5k ath5k 0000:04:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) ath5k 0000:04:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 ath5k 0000:04:00.0: registered as 'phy0' ath5k phy0: failed to wakeup the MAC Chip ath5k 0000:04:00.0: PCI INT A disabled ath5k: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -5 should i file a bug and where ? -- )) (( c[_] mmmmm, tea... 2009/5/6 Kris Weston <kris.wes...@gmail.com> > oh right the mod said it may be that they were both wanting wlan0 and thats > why it didnt werk.. > after turning off iwl3945 still no joy though... > > ive been messing with persistent-rules - ill check out what you mention > thanks very much ! :) > -- > > )) > (( > c[_] mmmmm, tea... > > > 2009/5/6 Bob Copeland <m...@bobcopeland.com> > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Kris Weston <kris.wes...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > sorry im not sure what you mean by that ? >> > i am able to work around this by configuration or its not poss ? >> > they advise me to turn off iwl3945 which is not ideal obviously... >> >> Choosing the interface name is the job of user space, not the >> driver. Take a look at udev, ip(8) and ifrename(8) commands, >> for example. >> >> -- >> Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com >> > >
_______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
