On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 22:26 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Huh? That's confusing. Also, you say you get a BUG but point out a > WARN_ON_ONCE, was that an oversight or does something crash there?
Sorry, I meant WARN_ON_ONCE. > OTOH, I can see one thing happening -- it would access scan_channel. > Patch should fix that, does it help? Yes, that does the trick! Several scans with iw and iwlist while flood pinging the AP don't cause any kernel messages. Thank you! -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel