On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 22:26 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:

> Huh? That's confusing. Also, you say you get a BUG but point out a
> WARN_ON_ONCE, was that an oversight or does something crash there?

Sorry, I meant WARN_ON_ONCE.

> OTOH, I can see one thing happening -- it would access scan_channel.
> Patch should fix that, does it help?

Yes, that does the trick!  Several scans with iw and iwlist while flood
pinging the AP don't cause any kernel messages.  Thank you!

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to