On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 17:29 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 22:26 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> > Huh? That's confusing. Also, you say you get a BUG but point out a
> > WARN_ON_ONCE, was that an oversight or does something crash there?
> 
> Sorry, I meant WARN_ON_ONCE.

Ok, no worries, just got confused for a second what you meant.

> > OTOH, I can see one thing happening -- it would access scan_channel.
> > Patch should fix that, does it help?
> 
> Yes, that does the trick!  Several scans with iw and iwlist while flood
> pinging the AP don't cause any kernel messages.  Thank you!

Ok, thanks for testing. I'll figure out the real problem and fix it.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to