Jouni Malinen a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > >> I don't have an ath5k based card at hand. I will try to grab one and >> will give an example of said frame. Basically, I followed the same >> strategy for ath9k already. >> > > Are you saying that this patch has not actually been tested at all on > ath5k and it was just based on the changes you did for ath9k? If that is > the case, I would suggest running the tests before actually applying > this. We should really not depend on undocumented hardware behavior to > remain the same between different revisions. That's why I did not like > the changes in ath9k and would not exactly like extending that to even > more different chips taken into account that none of this is needed for > normal use of the card. > > No. It has been tested the same way I tested ath9k, ie using 2 cards in monitor mode and reading/writing 802.11 frame and checking that they are the same on the other side. I just need to swap my ath9k based card (AR9280) with an ath5k based card (AR5212) in my laptop and redo the test. I will do so in a couple of days.
Regards, Benoit _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
