On 12 February 2010 00:11, Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> Likely we don't distinguish on the name output AR9280 vs AR9281, > should be a trivial fix, just as renaming AR9220 to PCI AR9280, > but it hasn't been prioritized. It caused me a bit of confusion while trying to understand why I couldn't connect to a 5Ghz network, but I probably should have trusted iw in the first place. >> As I understand it, AR9280 should be dual band, and shouldn't have a >> separate phy, so I don't even get what that AR5133 is about... > > Ignore that, on recent kernels that second output is removed. > The radios on integrated on the single chip post AR9280. You can > read the top of phy.c for more info. Oh, I actually read the patch that introduced that, but failed to notice that it wasn't merged in 2.6.32, so I didn't understand what was going on.. Thank you! Luca _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
