On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Marek Lindner <lindner_ma...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 13:13:27 Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Right, so it's an embedded board inside a wireless router? Which router? :)
>
> The OM2P but how is this going to help ? I have the feeling we are not getting
> closer to answer my question: Why does ath9k_hw_4k_get_eeprom() requires the
> minor version 19 or above before even considering to read the eeprom value ?
> Can I propose a patch that removes that check ? I already have that patch
> working for me - just wanted to be sure it does no harm.

hi,

yes, looks like the check should not be there for common, but I don't
know for what reason the developer made it as a common check. let me
check it out.  please wait. does any one has any comments.  can you
please share what is the issue you are issuing


>
>
> Regards,
> Marek
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>



-- 
shafi
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Reply via email to