On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Marek Lindner <lindner_ma...@yahoo.de> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 13:13:27 Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Right, so it's an embedded board inside a wireless router? Which router? :) > > The OM2P but how is this going to help ? I have the feeling we are not getting > closer to answer my question: Why does ath9k_hw_4k_get_eeprom() requires the > minor version 19 or above before even considering to read the eeprom value ? > Can I propose a patch that removes that check ? I already have that patch > working for me - just wanted to be sure it does no harm.
hi, yes, looks like the check should not be there for common, but I don't know for what reason the developer made it as a common check. let me check it out. please wait. does any one has any comments. can you please share what is the issue you are issuing > > > Regards, > Marek > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel > -- shafi _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel