On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wirel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Marek Lindner <lindner_ma...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 13:13:27 Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> Right, so it's an embedded board inside a wireless router? Which router? :) >> >> The OM2P but how is this going to help ? I have the feeling we are not >> getting >> closer to answer my question: Why does ath9k_hw_4k_get_eeprom() requires the >> minor version 19 or above before even considering to read the eeprom value ? >> Can I propose a patch that removes that check ? I already have that patch >> working for me - just wanted to be sure it does no harm. > > hi, > > yes, looks like the check should not be there for common, but I don't > know for what reason the developer made it as a common check. let me > check it out. please wait. does any one has any comments. can you > please share what is the issue you are issuing
adding the people who made those changes, I am also unable to understand. verified with the internal code base, the check was not there. > > >> >> >> Regards, >> Marek >> _______________________________________________ >> ath9k-devel mailing list >> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org >> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel >> > > > > -- > shafi > -- shafi _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
