Hi all,

I'm just forwarding what Robert said. FreeBSD doesn't have the same
interruptions as ath9k does on the AR5416.

I don't have the time to go digging myself just now.

On 3 August 2011 05:37, Robert Högberg <robert.hogb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> An update to previous mail..
>
> I tried the i386 version of FreeBSD 9.0 beta (instead of amd64) and
> that one worked much, much better. No network interruptions every 30
> seconds in FreeBSD 9.0 beta 1, but I only ran the test for a few
> minutes. Would you expect the noise floor calibrations to happen every
> 30 seconds in FreeBSD also or is the interval different there?
>
> I'll continue investigating.
>
> (You may want to look into why the ath driver doesn't work on amd64..)
>
> Robert
>
> 2011/8/2 Robert Högberg <robert.hogb...@gmail.com>:
>> I tried FreeBSD and the computer crashed when I tried to enable the WLAN.
>>
>> I'm no FreeBSD user so I'm not sure I got things right, but here's what I 
>> did:
>> * Boot FreeBSD from USB stick (WLAN device was detected correctly and
>> ath0 created)
>> * ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ath0
>> * ifconfig wlan0 up (This caused the computer to freeze. No output,
>> and no input possible. I waited minutes but nothing happened.)
>>
>> I attach dmesg output after boot.
>>
>> /Robert
>>
>> 2011/8/2 Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org>:
>>> Ah, that it works well in Windows is a good sign.
>>>
>>> Would you mind doing me a favour? Could you spin up FreeBSD-9.0-BETA1
>>> on a temporary disk (eg a USB thumb drive) and see if it exhibits the
>>> same behaviour?
>>>
>>>
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>> On 2 August 2011 04:19, Robert Högberg <robert.hogb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2011/7/30 Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org>:
>>>>> Have you tried another ath9k NIC? Another AR5416 NIC?
>>>>
>>>> I've tried an AR9271 NIC (USB ID 0cf3:9271) and it works very well. I
>>>> only have one AR5416 NIC to test I'm afraid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible this NIC is slightly weirdly damaged?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe, but the card works well with the Windows 7 drivers. But I guess
>>>> it's possible that the noise floor calibration functionality is
>>>> broken/problematic on this card and the Windows driver knows this and
>>>> avoids or adapts to the problem. After all, I don't see any problems
>>>> with the calibration disabled so maybe the Windows driver doesn't use
>>>> the calibration either. But I don't know..
>>>>
>>>> TP-Link has released a v2 version of this TL-WN851N NIC (I'm using v1)
>>>> which suggests the first version may not have been perfect. Maybe v1
>>>> was "weirdly damaged" and they fixed it in the second version. I don't
>>>> know what the differences are between the two versions, but I think
>>>> they used AR5416 in both versions.
>>>>
>>>> Robert
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Reply via email to