.. sorry, he isn't having issues with the AR5416 on FreeBSD but is under ath9k.

(Wow, is this the second time FreeBSD works where ath9k doesn't? I may
have to throw a little private party :-)

Would someone like to take up the challenge? I'll help you wade
through the HAL if you'd like.


Adrian

On 9 August 2011 09:12, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just forwarding what Robert said. FreeBSD doesn't have the same
> interruptions as ath9k does on the AR5416.
>
> I don't have the time to go digging myself just now.
>
> On 3 August 2011 05:37, Robert Högberg <robert.hogb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> An update to previous mail..
>>
>> I tried the i386 version of FreeBSD 9.0 beta (instead of amd64) and
>> that one worked much, much better. No network interruptions every 30
>> seconds in FreeBSD 9.0 beta 1, but I only ran the test for a few
>> minutes. Would you expect the noise floor calibrations to happen every
>> 30 seconds in FreeBSD also or is the interval different there?
>>
>> I'll continue investigating.
>>
>> (You may want to look into why the ath driver doesn't work on amd64..)
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> 2011/8/2 Robert Högberg <robert.hogb...@gmail.com>:
>>> I tried FreeBSD and the computer crashed when I tried to enable the WLAN.
>>>
>>> I'm no FreeBSD user so I'm not sure I got things right, but here's what I 
>>> did:
>>> * Boot FreeBSD from USB stick (WLAN device was detected correctly and
>>> ath0 created)
>>> * ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ath0
>>> * ifconfig wlan0 up (This caused the computer to freeze. No output,
>>> and no input possible. I waited minutes but nothing happened.)
>>>
>>> I attach dmesg output after boot.
>>>
>>> /Robert
>>>
>>> 2011/8/2 Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org>:
>>>> Ah, that it works well in Windows is a good sign.
>>>>
>>>> Would you mind doing me a favour? Could you spin up FreeBSD-9.0-BETA1
>>>> on a temporary disk (eg a USB thumb drive) and see if it exhibits the
>>>> same behaviour?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Adrian
>>>>
>>>> On 2 August 2011 04:19, Robert Högberg <robert.hogb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 2011/7/30 Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org>:
>>>>>> Have you tried another ath9k NIC? Another AR5416 NIC?
>>>>>
>>>>> I've tried an AR9271 NIC (USB ID 0cf3:9271) and it works very well. I
>>>>> only have one AR5416 NIC to test I'm afraid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it possible this NIC is slightly weirdly damaged?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe, but the card works well with the Windows 7 drivers. But I guess
>>>>> it's possible that the noise floor calibration functionality is
>>>>> broken/problematic on this card and the Windows driver knows this and
>>>>> avoids or adapts to the problem. After all, I don't see any problems
>>>>> with the calibration disabled so maybe the Windows driver doesn't use
>>>>> the calibration either. But I don't know..
>>>>>
>>>>> TP-Link has released a v2 version of this TL-WN851N NIC (I'm using v1)
>>>>> which suggests the first version may not have been perfect. Maybe v1
>>>>> was "weirdly damaged" and they fixed it in the second version. I don't
>>>>> know what the differences are between the two versions, but I think
>>>>> they used AR5416 in both versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Reply via email to