On 2011-10-31 9:24 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 1 November 2011 00:04, Mohammed Shafi<shafi.wirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:02 PM, David Summers > >> i assume if we remove the antenna in chain0, the performance will be >> bad. as per my assumption tx will always happen in chain0.(does we >> have some tx diversity?) > > If you have an AR9285 with an antenna switch (and I don't have one, so > I can't test) then you MAY be ok. But Felix and others have removed > that TX diversity code from ath9k. > So I'm not sure whether the antenna switch based TX diversity code > would work. FreeBSD? It may work. > > But unless you're very lucky, I suggest "no" to the AR9285 + TX diversity :) > > (I'll see if I can source some more AR9285's, hopefully one will have > the antenna switch hardware attached.) As far as I know, the AR9285 chip does not have any tx diversity.
- Felix _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
