On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 09:38 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> + * @RX_FLAG_STBC_MASK: STBC 2 bit bitmask. 1 - Nss=1, 2 - Nss=2, 3 - Nss=3
> + RX_FLAG_STBC_MASK = BIT(26) | BIT(27),
> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ ieee80211_add_rx_radiotap_header(struct ieee80211_local
> *local,
> pos += 2;
>
> if (status->flag & RX_FLAG_HT) {
> + unsigned int stbc = status->flag & RX_FLAG_STBC_MASK;
> rthdr->it_present |= cpu_to_le32(1 << IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_MCS);
> *pos++ = local->hw.radiotap_mcs_details;
> *pos = 0;
> @@ -267,6 +268,9 @@ ieee80211_add_rx_radiotap_header(struct ieee80211_local
> *local,
> *pos |= IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_MCS_BW_40;
> if (status->flag & RX_FLAG_HT_GF)
> *pos |= IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_MCS_FMT_GF;
> + if (stbc)
> + *pos |= (stbc >> RX_FLAG_STBC_SHIFT)
> + << IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_MCS_STBC_SHIFT;
> pos++;
> *pos++ = status->rate_idx;
Here you forgot the "HAVE" bit.
> - IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_MCS_HAVE_BW;
> + IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_MCS_HAVE_BW |
> + IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_MCS_HAVE_STBC;
And here it's completely bogus.
johannes
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
