On Sunday, August 21, 2016 4:31:03 PM CEST Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> +pci {
> + pcie@0 {
> + reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
It's not clear what these two nodes refer to in the example. Is the top-level
node the PCI host bridge, and the second node the first PCIe port?
Maybe add the properties from a real system here to make this a little
clearer.
The unit address for the slot should be "00,0", not "0" here.
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + #address-cells = <3>;
> + device_type = "pci";
> +
I think this needs an empty "ranges" property to be a valid bridge node.
> + ath9k@0,0 {
According to the PCI binding, the name should be the same as the
compatible string here, or match the class code in the table.
> + compatible = "pci168c,0030";
> + reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
Are the device/fn numbers all zero on your system? This is a bit
confusing, as it's not immediately clear what the reg properties
refers to. Also, I think the length should reflect the actual length
of the config space, either 0x100 or 0x1000.
> + qca,disable-5ghz;
> + };
> + };
> +};
Arnd
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
