On 6/11/05 12:17 AM, "Thomas Broyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. atom:link
>
> I really don't see the problem hereĀ
on reflection, there isn't a problem
case 1:
APP-client POSTs an entry with atom:content ...
atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'alternate'] not required,
server can add it in the feed
case 2:
APP-client POSTs an entry with no atom:content ...
atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'alternate'] is required, but
the APP-client very likely knows where it is
I can't imagine a situation where an author wants to write an entry with
only a summary and not referencing some content.
e.
