On 11/9/05, Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9 Nov 2005, at 17:07, Luke Arno wrote: > > It sounds like you need a workflow. > > > > Create a feed of entries with some flag extension. > > Flag all your unprocessed entries. Remove the flag > > as you process them so that they will disappear > > from the feed. Ordering by updated still poses no > > problem that I can see. > > > > http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceWorkflows > > Missing text on the wiki there... >
What did I miss? > > I acknowledge that back-splicing old entries into a > > feed after the fact will cause them to be missed at > > sync. Repairing broken feeds and the like would > > require the client to either a walk back through the > > whole feed (or at least to a specified date) or use > > a "repaired entries" feed of some kind. > > interesting idea This was just dashed off of the top of my head. There are probably other ways to deal with these border cases. - Luke [ snip ]
