I certainly hope this doesn't mean that we cannot discuss the various spec interpretation issues that may arise out of the test suite implementation. For instance, the issue of what status codes should be expected from a server in response to various operations. I would think such discussions are very much in the scope of this WG, especially now that we're in a "just go implement the damn thing" mode.
- James
On 3/14/06, Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe made an announcement of a service that is useful to this list;
that's fine. Others made comments on this list on whether or not that
service was correct; that's kinda fine, since it is an alert to
people who read Joe's response.
The rest of this thread is not appropriate for the mailing list. I
would imagine that the people who run the feed validator can set up a
mailing list of their own to discuss commit rights and procedures,
and to discuss which tests match the desired goals of their project;
if not, they can contact me and I'll set one up for them at IMC.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium
--
- James Snell
http://www.snellspace.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
