I've discussed this change on many occasions. I think I even filed a pace or two regarding it. Never seemed to take.
- James Bill de hÓra wrote: > > Sammy wrote: >> I'm extremely sorry; did I sound bitchy/demanding? I appologize :-) >> >> I don't believe I'm qualified enough to write a Pace for it. In fact, >> I don't even know what the process of submitting it would be if I >> wrote it. >> >> Allow me to rephrase. It looks like this issue has been brought up >> several times, so I'm wondering why it's not settled until now even >> though most of the other issues have at least been tackled (I think so)? > > It maybe had something to do with timing; low energy levels, high list > traffic, some silly row sucking up all the wg's attention (we get that > from time to time). On this specific matter, I don't think we're in a > position to say to you this is old ground and the decision has been made. > > cheers > Bill > >
