On 4/24/06, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James M Snell wrote:
> > The Entry includes one atom:link with a link relation of "enclosure", > > and a second with a link relation "edit-enclosure", respectively > > identifying the IRI's used for public read-only referencing of the media > > resource and the IRI to be used for modifying the media resource. > > I'm -1 to this part. Why do we need to divide safe and unsafe operations > using URIs, when HTTP has methods for doing that across one URI already? But what if there is more than one URI? The example is one URI for read-only usage and the other for the editing interface. http://static.example.org/images/mycat.png http://app.example.org/jcgregorio/edit.cgi/mycat.png Sure they could be the same and so the values of rel="enclosure" and rel="edit-enclosure" would be the same in that case, but I believe there needs to be a way to support two URIs and a hint to the client as to the use of each. -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
