On 4/24/06, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm -1 to this part. Why do we need to divide safe and unsafe operations > using URIs, when HTTP has methods for doing that across one URI already?
I'm also skeptical, but won't stand in the way. Maybe I don't understand the requirement. Is the thought that authoring clients and non-authoring clients will be "sharing" the same feeds, so we must have elements the non-authoring clients will ignore? I find that scenario kind of forced. Do any current implementations work this way? -- Robert Sayre
