On 5/7/06, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this would work though, right?
<entry>
...
<source>
<generator uri="http://www.example.com/FooPublisher";
version="1.0">Foo Publisher 1.0</generator>
</source>
</entry>
rfc4287
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt
4.2.11. The "atom:source" Element
If an atom:entry is copied from one feed into another feed, then the
source atom:feed's metadata (all child elements of atom:feed other
than the atom:entry elements) MAY be preserved within the copied
entry by adding an atom:source child element, if it is not already
present in the entry,
Seems like atom:source is not intended to be used like this...because,
in this case, atom:entry is not really copied from a feed into a feed...
It's little off from spec's intention, but OK with spec itself, and It seems
to work smoothly with existing codes.
I don't know everyone else think of this, but I'm not sure about this one.
