On 7/5/06 9:24 PM, "Toru Marumoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like atom:source is not intended to be used like this...because, > in this case, atom:entry is not really copied from a feed into a feed... > It's little off from spec's intention, but OK with spec itself, and It seems > to work smoothly with existing codes. > I don't know everyone else think of this, but I'm not sure about this one. maybe there is a feed somewhere which is a list of all the errors generated. but I get your point :-) e.
