Tim Bray wrote:
>
> <co-chair-mode>
> As we see it, there are really only 1.5 issues outstanding. Media
> entries is obvious. I had an action item to make PaceMediaEntries more
> human-readable; thus, check out
> http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceMediaEntries5
>
PME5 looks good to me.
> There's been a lot of discussion of the iterations of this Pace, and a
> lot of it was of the form "sort of OK, but I'm uncomfortable with
> XXX". So before we do the last-chance +/- survey, we'd like one last
> call for amendments, improvements to the Pace that might move people
> from negative to positive.
>
> Second: Categories. As of now, the draft is silent on the subject,
> which your co-chairs think is questionable, and we want the WG to do
> some more work.
>
>[snip]
> PaceCategoryLink didn't get much commentary:
> http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceCategoryLink
>
My preference would be PaceCategoryLink or nothing.
There is a strong likelihood that at least one standardized extension to
the introspection format will emerge for the purpose of communicating
various features/options enabled/supported by a collection, the category
stuff could easily fit into such an extension.
- James
