*grumble* > Given our previous discussion about icons: why aren't these link relations > with mailto URLs?
Not meant to fixate this on the follow-up'er, but everything you ever wanted and extend Atom with is just conceptual things. There is no difference between a defined ontology with all the entities and relationships of Atom, and in fact you can define the whole shebang in any ontological language. It just so happens that Atom is a short-list of ontological expression defined in a format of sorts. Where do the data model, format it's defined in and the ontology stop and start? At some point the Atom model becomes so complex that it loses its easy applicability, and perhaps should enter the realm of ontological work. Anyone done any mappings of this so far? Kind regards, Alex -- Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ ---------------------------------------------- ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---
