link certainly could be used but just doesn't seem like a good fit. Things like type, length, hreflang, nor ANY of the proposed link extensions would apply.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. < [email protected]> wrote: > HI James, > > Given our previous discussion about icons: why aren't these link relations > with mailto URLs? > > -- Ernie P. > > On Oct 15, 2010, at 2:02 PM, James Snell wrote: > > Wanted to draw attention to this: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-norris-atompub-audience-00.html > > It introduces to/cc/bcc elements to an Atom entry. > > <entry> > ... > <to>acct:[email protected] <acct%[email protected]></to> > <to>acct:[email protected] <acct%[email protected]></to> > <cc>acct:[email protected] <acct%[email protected]></cc> > <cc>acct:[email protected] <acct%[email protected]></cc> > <bcc>acct:[email protected] <acct%[email protected]></bcc> > <bcc>acct:[email protected] <acct%[email protected]></bcc> > ... > </entry> > > Comments are welcomed and requested. > > - James > > >
