Re: Questions about -04

[Martin Duerst]

(BAt 01:51 05/01/26, Asbj$B�S(Bn Ulsberg wrote:
(B >
(B >On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:54:27 -0500, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B >wrote:
(B >
(B >>> 2. Why MUST a feed point to an alternate version. [...]
(B >>
(B >> I'm -1 on removing this restriction.
(B >
(B >I thought we came to a sort of consensus that the link should be optional.
(B >Or was that only for atom:entry? Anyway, I think both of them should be
(B >optional. That is, I disagree with you, Sam.
(B
(BI agree with Asbjoern.     Regards,   Martin.