atom-syntax  

Messages by Date

• 2005/08/20 Re: xml:base abuse Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/20 Re: OpenSearch and Atom Prototype Peter Robinson
• 2005/08/19 OpenSearch and Atom Prototype James M Snell
• 2005/08/18 Re: Where's the Registry of Link Relations? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• 2005/08/18 Where's the Registry of Link Relations? Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/18 Re: FYI: Expires Extension Draft Elias Torres
• 2005/08/18 Re: FYI: Expires Extension Draft Walter Underwood
• 2005/08/18 Re: FYI: Expires Extension Draft James M Snell
• 2005/08/18 Re: FYI: Expires Extension Draft Elias Torres
• 2005/08/18 Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-03.txt] Peter Saint-Andre
• 2005/08/18 Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-03.txt] Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/18 Re: Protocol Action: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard Karl Dubost
• 2005/08/17 FYI: Expires Extension Draft James M Snell
• 2005/08/17 Re: Protocol Action: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard Graham
• 2005/08/17 RE: Protocol Action: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard Bob Wyman
• 2005/08/17 Protocol Action: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard The IESG
• 2005/08/17 Re: Feed History -03 Tim Bray
• 2005/08/17 Re: Feed History -03 Henry Story
• 2005/08/17 Re: Feed History -03 Thomas Broyer
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 David Powell
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Henry Story
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 David Powell
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/16 I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-format-11.txt Internet-Drafts
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Henry Story
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/16 Re: xml:base abuse Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Henry Story
• 2005/08/16 Re: xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Stefan Eissing
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/16 Re: xml:base abuse Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Henry Story
• 2005/08/16 Re: xml:base abuse A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/16 Re: xml:base abuse A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/16 Re: Feed History -03 Stefan Eissing
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/15 Re: Feed History -03 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/15 Re: Feed History -03 Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/15 Re: Feed History -03 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/15 Re: Feed History -03 Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/15 Extension spec updates James M Snell
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Bjoern Hoehrmann
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/15 Feed History -03 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Tim Bray
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/15 AtomPubIssuesList for 2005/08/15 Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Roger B.
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/15 Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/15 RE: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format Bob Wyman
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Bjoern Hoehrmann
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Tim Bray
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/15 Re: xml:base abuse Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/15 xml:base abuse Sjoerd Visscher
• 2005/08/14 Re: atom:id spec bug Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/13 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/13 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/13 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? Walter Underwood
• 2005/08/13 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? Tim Bray
• 2005/08/13 atom:id spec bug Graham
• 2005/08/13 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? Simon Brown
• 2005/08/12 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/12 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) Thomas Broyer
• 2005/08/12 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates Paul Hoffman
• 2005/08/12 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? Walter Underwood
• 2005/08/12 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/12 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates Martin Duerst
• 2005/08/12 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? Graham
• 2005/08/12 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? Tim Bray
• 2005/08/12 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates Joe Gregorio
• 2005/08/12 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates Bill de hÓra
• 2005/08/12 Re: Spec explanations for Pebble? Graham Parks
• 2005/08/12 Spec explanations for Pebble? Carey Evans
• 2005/08/11 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/11 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates James M Snell
• 2005/08/11 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates Walter Underwood
• 2005/08/11 Re: Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/11 Finishing up on whitespace in IRIs and dates Paul Hoffman
• 2005/08/11 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/11 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) Justin Fletcher
• 2005/08/11 Re: More about Extensions David Powell
• 2005/08/11 Re: More about Extensions David Powell
• 2005/08/11 Re: More about Extensions David Powell
• 2005/08/11 Re: Comments Draft A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/11 Re: Comments Draft A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/11 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/10 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/10 Re: Comments Draft James M Snell
• 2005/08/10 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) James M Snell
• 2005/08/10 Re: Comments Draft Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/10 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/10 Re: Comments Draft A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/10 Re: Comments Draft James M Snell
• 2005/08/10 Re: Comments Draft A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/10 Re: Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/10 Re: More about Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/10 Re: More about Extensions Roger B.
• 2005/08/10 Re: Feed History -02 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/10 Re: Expires extension draft (was Re: Feed History -02) Walter Underwood
• 2005/08/10 Re: Expires extension draft (was Re: Feed History -02) James M Snell
• 2005/08/10 Re: More about Extensions David Powell
• 2005/08/10 Re: More about Extensions David Powell
• 2005/08/09 Re: More about Extensions Henry Story
• 2005/08/09 Re: Expires extension draft (was Re: Feed History -02) Henry Story
• 2005/08/09 Re: Expires extension draft (was Re: Feed History -02) James M Snell
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 James M Snell
• 2005/08/09 Re: Expires extension draft (was Re: Feed History -02) Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/09 Expires extension draft (was Re: Feed History -02) James M Snell
• 2005/08/09 Re: More about Extensions James M Snell
• 2005/08/09 Re: More about Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/09 Re: More about Extensions Tim Bray
• 2005/08/09 Re: More about Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/09 Re: More about Extensions David Powell
• 2005/08/09 Re: More about Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 Mark Nottingham
• 2005/08/09 More about Extensions David Powell
• 2005/08/09 [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-03.txt] Peter Saint-Andre
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 James M Snell
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 Henry Story
• 2005/08/09 FYI: License and Comments I-D's Submitted James M Snell
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 James M Snell
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 Henry Story
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 Walter Underwood
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 James M Snell
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 Walter Underwood
• 2005/08/09 Re: Feed History -02 Henry Story
• 2005/08/09 Re: nested feeds (was: Feed History -02) Henry Story
• 2005/08/09 Project descriptions with Atom Danny Ayers
• 2005/08/08 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Henri Sivonen
• 2005/08/08 Updated Comments Draft (getting closer) James M Snell
• 2005/08/08 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Dave Pawson
• 2005/08/08 RE: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Scott Hollenbeck
• 2005/08/08 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/07 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Tim Bray
• 2005/08/07 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Tim Bray
• 2005/08/07 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Tim Bray
• 2005/08/07 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Bill de hÓra
• 2005/08/07 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Brett Lindsley
• 2005/08/06 Re: Simple Extensions and xml:base David Powell
• 2005/08/05 Re: Two Proposed Resolutions for whitespace handling. James Aylett
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Walter Underwood
• 2005/08/05 Re: Two Proposed Resolutions for whitespace handling. James M Snell
• 2005/08/05 Two Proposed Resolutions for whitespace handling. Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/05 Re: Comments Draft Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? James M Snell
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Bill de hÓra
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/05 Re: Simple Extensions and xml:base Tim Bray
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Bill de hÓra
• 2005/08/05 Re: Simple Extensions and xml:base Bill de hÓra
• 2005/08/05 Re: Simple Extensions and xml:base David Powell
• 2005/08/05 Re: Comments Draft Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/05 Re: Comments Draft Tim Bray
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Tim Bray
• 2005/08/05 Re: Simple Extensions and xml:base Tim Bray
• 2005/08/05 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Bill de hÓra
• 2005/08/05 Re: Comments Draft A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/05 Re: Comments Draft A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/04 Simple Extensions and xml:base David Powell
• 2005/08/04 Re: Comments Draft Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/04 Re: Comments Draft James M Snell
• 2005/08/04 Re: comments spec: id URIs in @href, vs 301 Moved James M Snell
• 2005/08/04 Re: comments spec: id URIs in @href, vs 301 Moved James M Snell
• 2005/08/04 Re: Comments Draft A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/04 Re: comments spec: id URIs in @href, vs 301 Moved A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/04 Re: comments spec: id URIs in @href, vs 301 Moved Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/04 Re: comments spec: id URIs in @href, vs 301 Moved A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/04 comments spec: id URIs in @href, vs 301 Moved Eric Scheid
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Robert Sayre
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Bill de hÓra
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Bill de hÓra
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? A. Pagaltzis
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Sam Ruby
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? James M Snell
• 2005/08/04 Re: Comments Draft James M Snell
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Joe Gregorio
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Julian Reschke
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Dave Pawson
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Dave Pawson
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? Tim Bray
• 2005/08/04 Re: spec bug: can we fix for draft-11? A. Pagaltzis

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]