On 26/1/05 3:59 AM, "Asbjørn Ulsberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -0.7. Turns <link> into a kitchen sink by using it to point to things >> that are intended to be pre-fetched and presented along with the content > > I agree. I think we should have chosen another element name. <link> turns > out to be HTML's <input> where just «everything goes». I don't like it, > but if it has to be <link> or nothing, I'd go with <link>. I'm also -1 on this. It muddles the semantic of the <link> element. e.
